1. Are you a WAAO member   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 100% 254     No 0% 0 Total Respondents   254 (skipped this question)   1

2. Are you a Statutory Assessor   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 43.7% 111     No 56.3% 143 Total Respondents   254 (skipped this question)   1

3. Number of Years in the Profession  Total Respondents   254 (skipped this question)   1

4. Jurisdiction   Response Percent Response Total     City 52.4% 133     Town 6.7% 17     Village 6.3% 16     State 10.6% 27     Multiple 24% 61 Total Respondents   254 (skipped this question)   1

5. General WAAO Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A Response Total I am personally in agreement with the goals of WAAO. 29% (66) 60% (135) 10% (22) 1% (2) 0% (0) 0% (1) 226 The number and structure of committees is appropriate to achieve our mission. 14% (32) 58% (130) 22% (50) 3% (7) 1% (2) 2% (5) 226 This organization's planning and leadership efforts are helpful to its growth and development. 22% (49) 65% (146) 10% (23) 3% (7) 0% (0) 0% (1) 226 The leadership of the organization is responsive to its members. 17% (39) 60% (136) 17% (39) 2% (4) 2% (4) 2% (4) 226 There are adequate opportunities for members to become involved in WAAO. 31% (69) 56% (126) 10% (23) 2% (5) 1% (2) 0% (1) 226 WAAO takes an active role in promoting the property assessment profession. 31% (69) 54% (121) 12% (28) 2% (5) 1% (2) 0% (1) 226 This organization reacts favorably to change. 9% (21) 51% (116) 31% (71) 6% (14) 0% (1) 1% (3) 226 The WAAO and DOR relationship contributes to achieving our mission. 13% (29) 59% (133) 21% (47) 5% (11) 2% (4) 1% (2) 226 WAAO works toward enhancing assessor's public image. 15% (35) 60% (136) 18% (40) 5% (12) 0% (1) 1% (2) 226 WAAO provides adequate assessor training opportunities. 27% (60) 53% (120) 14% (31) 4% (10) 2% (4) 0% (1) 226 WAAO keeps members up-to-date on new developments within the profession. 24% (55) 62% (141) 10% (23) 2% (5) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226 WAAO provides adequate opportunity to meet others in the property assessment profession. 30% (67) 61% (137) 6% (14) 3% (6) 0% (0) 1% (2) 226 The AVOW newsletter is an adequate source of property assessment related information. 22% (49) 65% (147) 10% (23) 2% (5) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226 WAAO is effective at monitoring assessment legislation. 23% (53) 68% (153) 6% (14) 2% (4) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226 Total Respondents   226 (skipped this question)   29

6. General WAAO Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A Response Total WAAO provides sufficient guidance to those who wish to pursue an IAAO professional designation. 6% (14) 42% (95) 38% (85) 10% (23) 1% (2) 3% (7) 226 WAAO is effective at promoting an understand of assessment and taxation. 10% (23) 61% (138) 23% (51) 5% (11) 0% (1) 1% (2) 226 The WAAO web site is an adequate source of property assessment information. 12% (26) 58% (132) 24% (55) 3% (6) 1% (3) 2% (4) 226 Total Respondents   226 (skipped this question)   29

7. If you selected a "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" on any of the above questions, please explain why. Your comments will assist the Association in better focusing its efforts.  Total Respondents   41 (skipped this question)   214

8. Do you have access to the Internet?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 99.1% 224     No 0.9% 2 Total Respondents   226 (skipped this question)   29

9. Have you visited the WAAO web site?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 92.5% 209     No 7.5% 17 Total Respondents   226 (skipped this question)   29

10. Committee Performance Very Good Good Neutral Fair Poor N/A Response Total Awards Committee 12% (26) 43% (97) 32% (72) 4% (10) 1% (3) 7% (15) 223 Auditing Committee 11% (24) 40% (90) 40% (89) 0% (1) 0% (0) 9% (19) 223 Computer Assisted Assessment Committee 7% (15) 32% (72) 39% (86) 10% (22) 4% (8) 9% (20) 223 Education & Training Commitee 21% (46) 53% (118) 17% (38) 3% (6) 2% (5) 4% (10) 223 Legislative Committee 28% (62) 47% (104) 18% (40) 3% (6) 0% (1) 4% (10) 223 Membership Services Committee 16% (36) 45% (100) 30% (66) 2% (5) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223 Nominating Committee 9% (21) 41% (91) 39% (86) 4% (9) 1% (2) 6% (14) 223 Personal Property Committee 8% (17) 40% (89) 40% (89) 4% (8) 0% (1) 9% (19) 223 Planning & Management Committee 7% (16) 43% (96) 38% (85) 2% (5) 1% (3) 8% (18) 223 Property Tax Exemptions Committee 14% (32) 41% (92) 32% (71) 5% (12) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223 Public Relations Committee 11% (24) 43% (96) 35% (78) 4% (9) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223 Real Estate Standards Committee 14% (31) 43% (97) 32% (72) 3% (7) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223 Rural Concerns Committee 15% (34) 39% (88) 34% (76) 2% (4) 1% (3) 8% (18) 223 Total Respondents   223 (skipped this question)   32

11. WAAO should provide training opportunities in these categories:   Response Percent Response Total     1. 100% 76     2. 71.1% 54     3. 48.7% 37     4. 32.9% 25     5. 21.1% 16 Total Respondents   76 (skipped this question)   179

12. It would be beneficial if WAAO provided these additional services to members:   Response Percent Response Total     1. 100% 39     2. 43.6% 17     3. 30.8% 12     4. 17.9% 7     5. 7.7% 3 Total Respondents   39 (skipped this question)   216

13. Software Name or Company  Total Respondents   166 (skipped this question)   89

14. Rate Software   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 23.5% 39     Meets my Needs 65.1% 108     Outdated or Stagnant 11.4% 19 Total Respondents   166 (skipped this question)   89

15. Rate Support   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 23.7% 37     Without Delays 53.8% 84     Hard to Contact 22.4% 35 Total Respondents   156 (skipped this question)   99

16. Rate Utility   Response Percent Response Total     User Friendly 69.5% 114     Seldom 21.3% 35     Frequent Questions 9.1% 15 Total Respondents   164 (skipped this question)   91

17. Rate Municipal Use   Response Percent Response Total     Adaptable 71% 115     Programming Required 21.6% 35     Not Adaptable 7.4% 12 Total Respondents   162 (skipped this question)   93

18. Rate Flexibility   Response Percent Response Total     Flexible Options 56.4% 92     Seldom 31.3% 51     Frequent Tweaking 12.3% 20 Total Respondents   163 (skipped this question)   92

19. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 7% 13     No 93% 173 Total Respondents   186 (skipped this question)   69

20. Software Name or Company  Total Respondents   11 (skipped this question)   244

21. Rate Software   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 40% 4     Meets my Needs 60% 6     Outdated or Stagnant 0% 0 Total Respondents   10 (skipped this question)   245

22. Rate Support   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 40% 4     Without Delays 30% 3     Hard to Contact 30% 3 Total Respondents   10 (skipped this question)   245

23. Rate Utility   Response Percent Response Total     User Friendly 66.7% 6     Seldom 33.3% 3     Frequent Questions 0% 0 Total Respondents   9 (skipped this question)   246

24. Rate Municipal Use   Response Percent Response Total     Adaptable 80% 8     Programming Required 20% 2     Not Adaptable 0% 0 Total Respondents   10 (skipped this question)   245

25. Rate Flexibility   Response Percent Response Total     Flexible Options 70% 7     Seldom 20% 2     Frequent Tweaking 10% 1 Total Respondents   10 (skipped this question)   245

26. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 41.7% 5     No 58.3% 7 Total Respondents   12 (skipped this question)   243

27. Software Name or Company  Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   250

28. Rate Software   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 40% 2     Meets my Needs 60% 3     Outdated or Stagnant 0% 0 Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   250

29. Rate Support   Response Percent Response Total     Exceeds My Expectations 60% 3     Without Delays 40% 2     Hard to Contact 0% 0 Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   250

30. Rate Utility   Response Percent Response Total     User Friendly 60% 3     Seldom 20% 1     Frequent Questions 20% 1 Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   250

31. Rate Municipal Use   Response Percent Response Total     Adaptable 80% 4     Programming Required 20% 1     Not Adaptable 0% 0 Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   250

32. Rate Flexibility   Response Percent Response Total     Flexible Options 75% 3     Seldom 25% 1     Frequent Tweaking 0% 0 Total Respondents   4 (skipped this question)   251

33. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 0% 0     No 100% 4 Total Respondents   4 (skipped this question)   251

34. Please enter any additional information about your software(s):  Total Respondents   0 (skipped this question)   255

35. Should the policy be changed so that previous most valuable member winners can be reconsidered for the award for atypical or exceptional service to WAAO and Wisconsin Assessors?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 65.4% 142     No 34.6% 75 Total Respondents   217 (skipped this question)   38

36. Should WAAO   Response Percent Response Total     Continue Lobbyist work 85.7% 186     Count on members to contact legislators individually 14.3% 31 Total Respondents   217 (skipped this question)   38

37. WAAO should coordinate submitting Amicus Briefs on issues that affect values in multiple municipalities   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 91.7% 198     No 8.3% 18 Total Respondents   216 (skipped this question)   39

38. Your opinion regarding WAAO's financial involvement   Response Percent Response Total     WAAO should contract the Attorney and assume the total cost: Estimated $6,000 8.8% 19     WAAO should take the lead, but partner with others on costs: 68.5% 148     WAAO should not get involved financially 15.3% 33     WAAO members willing to pay additional dues to fund future legal briefs. 7.4% 16 Total Respondents   216 (skipped this question)   39

39. WAAO Cost Limit   Response Percent Response Total     $1,000 - $2,500 27.4% 31     $2,500 - $4,000 45.1% 51     $4,000 - $5,500 13.3% 15     More than $5,500 14.2% 16 Total Respondents   113 (skipped this question)   142

40. What has your municipality been doing to cope with spending CAPS: Please select all that apply:   Response Percent Response Total   Staff Cuts 56.8% 96   Service Cuts 42% 71   Fee Increases 55% 93   Increase Borrowing 20.7% 35   Public Fire Protection - Now Service Fee 9.5% 16   Other (please specify) 23.7% 40 Total Respondents   169 (skipped this question)   86

41. Do revaluations help with spending CAPS?   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 38.6% 59     No 61.4% 94 Total Respondents   153 (skipped this question)   102

42. Explain:  Total Respondents   57 (skipped this question)   198

43. I would like to serve as a WAAO Director   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 12.6% 26     No 87.4% 181 Total Respondents   207 (skipped this question)   48

44. I would like to serve on a WAAO Committee   Response Percent Response Total     Yes 19.3% 40     No 80.7% 167 Total Respondents   207 (skipped this question)   48

45. Committee   Response Percent Response Total     Preference 1: 79.4% 27     Preference 2: 32.4% 11     Name: 76.5% 26     Phone Number: 67.6% 23     Contact Information: 55.9% 19 Total Respondents   34 (skipped this question)   221