1. Are you a WAAO member
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
100% 254
    No
0% 0
Total Respondents   254
(skipped this question)   1
2. Are you a Statutory Assessor
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
43.7% 111
    No
56.3% 143
Total Respondents   254
(skipped this question)   1
3. Number of Years in the Profession
 Total Respondents  
254
(skipped this question)   1
4. Jurisdiction
  Response Percent Response Total
    City
52.4% 133
    Town
6.7% 17
    Village
6.3% 16
    State
10.6% 27
    Multiple
24% 61
Total Respondents   254
(skipped this question)   1
5. General WAAO
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A Response Total
I am personally in agreement with the goals of WAAO.
29% (66) 60% (135) 10% (22) 1% (2) 0% (0) 0% (1) 226
The number and structure of committees is appropriate to achieve our mission.
14% (32) 58% (130) 22% (50) 3% (7) 1% (2) 2% (5) 226
This organization's planning and leadership efforts are helpful to its growth and development.
22% (49) 65% (146) 10% (23) 3% (7) 0% (0) 0% (1) 226
The leadership of the organization is responsive to its members.
17% (39) 60% (136) 17% (39) 2% (4) 2% (4) 2% (4) 226
There are adequate opportunities for members to become involved in WAAO.
31% (69) 56% (126) 10% (23) 2% (5) 1% (2) 0% (1) 226
WAAO takes an active role in promoting the property assessment profession.
31% (69) 54% (121) 12% (28) 2% (5) 1% (2) 0% (1) 226
This organization reacts favorably to change.
9% (21) 51% (116) 31% (71) 6% (14) 0% (1) 1% (3) 226
The WAAO and DOR relationship contributes to achieving our mission.
13% (29) 59% (133) 21% (47) 5% (11) 2% (4) 1% (2) 226
WAAO works toward enhancing assessor's public image.
15% (35) 60% (136) 18% (40) 5% (12) 0% (1) 1% (2) 226
WAAO provides adequate assessor training opportunities.
27% (60) 53% (120) 14% (31) 4% (10) 2% (4) 0% (1) 226
WAAO keeps members up-to-date on new developments within the profession.
24% (55) 62% (141) 10% (23) 2% (5) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226
WAAO provides adequate opportunity to meet others in the property assessment profession.
30% (67) 61% (137) 6% (14) 3% (6) 0% (0) 1% (2) 226
The AVOW newsletter is an adequate source of property assessment related information.
22% (49) 65% (147) 10% (23) 2% (5) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226
WAAO is effective at monitoring assessment legislation.
23% (53) 68% (153) 6% (14) 2% (4) 0% (1) 0% (1) 226
Total Respondents   226
(skipped this question)   29
6. General WAAO
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A Response Total
WAAO provides sufficient guidance to those who wish to pursue an IAAO professional designation.
6% (14) 42% (95) 38% (85) 10% (23) 1% (2) 3% (7) 226
WAAO is effective at promoting an understand of assessment and taxation.
10% (23) 61% (138) 23% (51) 5% (11) 0% (1) 1% (2) 226
The WAAO web site is an adequate source of property assessment information.
12% (26) 58% (132) 24% (55) 3% (6) 1% (3) 2% (4) 226
Total Respondents   226
(skipped this question)   29
7. If you selected a "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" on any of the above questions, please explain why. Your comments will assist the Association in better focusing its efforts.
 Total Respondents  
41
(skipped this question)   214
8. Do you have access to the Internet?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
99.1% 224
    No
0.9% 2
Total Respondents   226
(skipped this question)   29
9. Have you visited the WAAO web site?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
92.5% 209
    No
7.5% 17
Total Respondents   226
(skipped this question)   29
10. Committee Performance
Very Good Good Neutral Fair Poor N/A Response Total
Awards Committee
12% (26) 43% (97) 32% (72) 4% (10) 1% (3) 7% (15) 223
Auditing Committee
11% (24) 40% (90) 40% (89) 0% (1) 0% (0) 9% (19) 223
Computer Assisted Assessment Committee
7% (15) 32% (72) 39% (86) 10% (22) 4% (8) 9% (20) 223
Education & Training Commitee
21% (46) 53% (118) 17% (38) 3% (6) 2% (5) 4% (10) 223
Legislative Committee
28% (62) 47% (104) 18% (40) 3% (6) 0% (1) 4% (10) 223
Membership Services Committee
16% (36) 45% (100) 30% (66) 2% (5) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223
Nominating Committee
9% (21) 41% (91) 39% (86) 4% (9) 1% (2) 6% (14) 223
Personal Property Committee
8% (17) 40% (89) 40% (89) 4% (8) 0% (1) 9% (19) 223
Planning & Management Committee
7% (16) 43% (96) 38% (85) 2% (5) 1% (3) 8% (18) 223
Property Tax Exemptions Committee
14% (32) 41% (92) 32% (71) 5% (12) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223
Public Relations Committee
11% (24) 43% (96) 35% (78) 4% (9) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223
Real Estate Standards Committee
14% (31) 43% (97) 32% (72) 3% (7) 0% (1) 7% (15) 223
Rural Concerns Committee
15% (34) 39% (88) 34% (76) 2% (4) 1% (3) 8% (18) 223
Total Respondents   223
(skipped this question)   32
11. WAAO should provide training opportunities in these categories:
  Response Percent Response Total
    1.
100% 76
    2.
71.1% 54
    3.
48.7% 37
    4.
32.9% 25
    5.
21.1% 16
Total Respondents   76
(skipped this question)   179
12. It would be beneficial if WAAO provided these additional services to members:
  Response Percent Response Total
    1.
100% 39
    2.
43.6% 17
    3.
30.8% 12
    4.
17.9% 7
    5.
7.7% 3
Total Respondents   39
(skipped this question)   216
13. Software Name or Company
 Total Respondents  
166
(skipped this question)   89
14. Rate Software
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
23.5% 39
    Meets my Needs
65.1% 108
    Outdated or Stagnant
11.4% 19
Total Respondents   166
(skipped this question)   89
15. Rate Support
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
23.7% 37
    Without Delays
53.8% 84
    Hard to Contact
22.4% 35
Total Respondents   156
(skipped this question)   99
16. Rate Utility
  Response Percent Response Total
    User Friendly
69.5% 114
    Seldom
21.3% 35
    Frequent Questions
9.1% 15
Total Respondents   164
(skipped this question)   91
17. Rate Municipal Use
  Response Percent Response Total
    Adaptable
71% 115
    Programming Required
21.6% 35
    Not Adaptable
7.4% 12
Total Respondents   162
(skipped this question)   93
18. Rate Flexibility
  Response Percent Response Total
    Flexible Options
56.4% 92
    Seldom
31.3% 51
    Frequent Tweaking
12.3% 20
Total Respondents   163
(skipped this question)   92
19. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
7% 13
    No
93% 173
Total Respondents   186
(skipped this question)   69
20. Software Name or Company
 Total Respondents  
11
(skipped this question)   244
21. Rate Software
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
40% 4
    Meets my Needs
60% 6
    Outdated or Stagnant
0% 0
Total Respondents   10
(skipped this question)   245
22. Rate Support
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
40% 4
    Without Delays
30% 3
    Hard to Contact
30% 3
Total Respondents   10
(skipped this question)   245
23. Rate Utility
  Response Percent Response Total
    User Friendly
66.7% 6
    Seldom
33.3% 3
    Frequent Questions
0% 0
Total Respondents   9
(skipped this question)   246
24. Rate Municipal Use
  Response Percent Response Total
    Adaptable
80% 8
    Programming Required
20% 2
    Not Adaptable
0% 0
Total Respondents   10
(skipped this question)   245
25. Rate Flexibility
  Response Percent Response Total
    Flexible Options
70% 7
    Seldom
20% 2
    Frequent Tweaking
10% 1
Total Respondents   10
(skipped this question)   245
26. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
41.7% 5
    No
58.3% 7
Total Respondents   12
(skipped this question)   243
27. Software Name or Company
 Total Respondents  
5
(skipped this question)   250
28. Rate Software
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
40% 2
    Meets my Needs
60% 3
    Outdated or Stagnant
0% 0
Total Respondents   5
(skipped this question)   250
29. Rate Support
  Response Percent Response Total
    Exceeds My Expectations
60% 3
    Without Delays
40% 2
    Hard to Contact
0% 0
Total Respondents   5
(skipped this question)   250
30. Rate Utility
  Response Percent Response Total
    User Friendly
60% 3
    Seldom
20% 1
    Frequent Questions
20% 1
Total Respondents   5
(skipped this question)   250
31. Rate Municipal Use
  Response Percent Response Total
    Adaptable
80% 4
    Programming Required
20% 1
    Not Adaptable
0% 0
Total Respondents   5
(skipped this question)   250
32. Rate Flexibility
  Response Percent Response Total
    Flexible Options
75% 3
    Seldom
25% 1
    Frequent Tweaking
0% 0
Total Respondents   4
(skipped this question)   251
33. Additional Software you would like to tell us about?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
0% 0
    No
100% 4
Total Respondents   4
(skipped this question)   251
34. Please enter any additional information about your software(s):
 Total Respondents  
0
(skipped this question)   255
35. Should the policy be changed so that previous most valuable member winners can be reconsidered for the award for atypical or exceptional service to WAAO and Wisconsin Assessors?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
65.4% 142
    No
34.6% 75
Total Respondents   217
(skipped this question)   38
36. Should WAAO
  Response Percent Response Total
    Continue Lobbyist work
85.7% 186
    Count on members to contact legislators individually
14.3% 31
Total Respondents   217
(skipped this question)   38
37. WAAO should coordinate submitting Amicus Briefs on issues that affect values in multiple municipalities
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
91.7% 198
    No
8.3% 18
Total Respondents   216
(skipped this question)   39
38. Your opinion regarding WAAO's financial involvement
  Response Percent Response Total
    WAAO should contract the Attorney and assume the total cost: Estimated $6,000
8.8% 19
    WAAO should take the lead, but partner with others on costs:
68.5% 148
    WAAO should not get involved financially
15.3% 33
    WAAO members willing to pay additional dues to fund future legal briefs.
7.4% 16
Total Respondents   216
(skipped this question)   39
39. WAAO Cost Limit
  Response Percent Response Total
    $1,000 - $2,500
27.4% 31
    $2,500 - $4,000
45.1% 51
    $4,000 - $5,500
13.3% 15
    More than $5,500
14.2% 16
Total Respondents   113
(skipped this question)   142
40. What has your municipality been doing to cope with spending CAPS: Please select all that apply:
  Response Percent Response Total
  Staff Cuts
56.8% 96
  Service Cuts
42% 71
  Fee Increases
55% 93
  Increase Borrowing
20.7% 35
  Public Fire Protection - Now Service Fee
9.5% 16
  Other (please specify)
23.7% 40
Total Respondents   169
(skipped this question)   86
41. Do revaluations help with spending CAPS?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
38.6% 59
    No
61.4% 94
Total Respondents   153
(skipped this question)   102
42. Explain:
 Total Respondents  
57
(skipped this question)   198
43. I would like to serve as a WAAO Director
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
12.6% 26
    No
87.4% 181
Total Respondents   207
(skipped this question)   48
44. I would like to serve on a WAAO Committee
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
19.3% 40
    No
80.7% 167
Total Respondents   207
(skipped this question)   48
45. Committee
  Response Percent Response Total
    Preference 1:
79.4% 27
    Preference 2:
32.4% 11
    Name:
76.5% 26
    Phone Number:
67.6% 23
    Contact Information:
55.9% 19
Total Respondents   34
(skipped this question)   221